InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

blackstns

04/25/07 1:03 PM

#11679 RE: ICEMAN1CO #11677

O.K., you really should stop before you make yourself look any worse.

Not that you ever had any credibility on this board, but whatever glimmer of hope you had for any is dissapearing at an alarming rate today. IMO of course.

Please do not take this as a personal attack. I am just trying to give you a hint.
icon url

analogdog

04/25/07 1:06 PM

#11680 RE: ICEMAN1CO #11677

Is there a portion of the PR that read and do not comprehend?

Historical reports are the archival information that would support the pursuit of a claim. Before spending the money to obtain NI43-101, a company would utilize it's own geologists and field teams to conduct a core sampling and do preliminary testing in a local lab. Those are the results that were "published". That is, results from the field samplings provide new information which is further support of the historical data compiled by others.... It tells them "this is the right spot."

Then it is sent to special lab for 43-101 analysis.... coming soon IMO.

They did not just go on historical data... they did their own tests... and that was published in part in yesterday's PR. Stop twisting... or learn how to read.

Apr 24, 2007 -- Globex / U Mining Resources Inc. (Other OTC:GLXI.PK - News) today announced the publication of preliminary results from various field tests on these 12 Company-owned Claims in the Ungava area of Northern Quebec. The results confirm the presence of Uranium on these properties. The unedited results from the surveying, detailing the following U308 concentrations:

icon url

eye_ater

04/25/07 1:07 PM

#11681 RE: ICEMAN1CO #11677

Are you saying that the uranium got up and walked away? Tht is why they need to get updated info?