Replies to post #262147 on Zeev's Turnips Talk Politics (ZTTP)

[seabass]

>>>He probably had to reload 15 or 16 times as it was.<<<


Don't care if it was 100 times. That's not the point. The point is that smaller clips means more interruptions for the shooter and more opportunity for the target. What's even to discuss about that?


>>>students weren't allowed to defend themselves at all because of the myopic gun law<<<


Or they weren't allowed to defend themselves because the gunfire was too overwhelming? Let's say he entered a room with 10 people. If you were one of those 10 people would you say your odds of surviving would be greater if the shooter had 8 round clips as opposed to 15 round clips at his disposal?

Other than that you have two unanswered questions to deal with from previous posts:

1. What's your argument for high capacity magazines being legally available anyway? Not talking about military or law enforcement use but for the average paranoid schizophrenic who makes a pit stop at the neighborhood gun parlor.

2. As for students......at what grade would you start to arm them? 10-year olds carrying guns? High school or first year in college? Either way you would have to trust kids with guns while telling them they're too immature to vote or buy booze.