nwLA: My advice is to only invest an amount you can afford to lose without hurting your lifestyle. This company is difficult to predict. Their pattern for years was to release all kinds of Press Releases at the end of the year to drive the share price up. Until the end of 2006, when management upheaval caused the stock price to plummet to its current depths. Their pattern was to go into hibernation for 6 or 7 months every year, from April to November. If that happens again we could see the share price drop into the 20's. Then again, they could pull another rabbit out of their hat and land some partnership deal on a vaccine or some government contract, in which case we could move higher from here. I'd say the chances for a move lower outweigh the chances for a move upward at this time. The company doesn't have enough money on hand to pay salaries AND get the production facility built. So they have to sell more shares, and at this point they'd be lucky to get a quarter a share in a PPO...that is more dilution and more downward pressure on the stock price. And, if for some reason they run into significant delays with construction that will add still further downward pressure. And, if God forbid one of their scientists would leave, well then that could cause a share price drop back down into the teens. The only reason I haven't yet bailed on this moribund stock is because the scientists still have faith and haven't bailed out. And, I can afford to lose my entire stake of about $100 K (at current prices) without hurting my semi-retirement lifestyle. It only represents about 6% of my portfolio. So, I would hold on and perhaps add some more shares when it hits the 30's this week and try to average down your aquisition costs. Then if it drops into the 20's, add a little more. The company is viable for as long as it retains its scientific talent. But if any of them bail....head for the exits.