InvestorsHub Logo

MrDlv

04/20/07 2:01 AM

#1033 RE: diamondjim2006 #1032

I found the following posted by a person on the yahoo message boards:






Web links concerning DKL's "Lifeguard" technology and its inventor.


Here are reports concering older products produced by DKL's Thomas Afilani, inventor of the world-famous Electroscope.

http://geotech.thunting.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reports.dat

Specifically these reports:

Electroscope 20 Here it is...
Electroscope 301 A follow-up ...
Electroscope 301 This report was ...


Quoting from this link:

http://geotech.thunting.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reports/escope/index.dat

"Electroscope has faded from the forefront over the years.
The owner of the Electroscope company is Thomas Afilani,
and after marketing to the treasure hunting industry he moved on to emergency search and rescue. His current dowsing gadget is called the DKL Lifeguard, and you can read all about it on his DKL web site. But don't miss the full test results from Sandia National Labs (from which Afilani liberally misquotes), nor Sandia's physical examination of the Lifeguard."

Sandia's Double-Blind Evaluation:

http://www.prod.sandia.gov/cgi-bin/techlib/access-control.pl/1998/980977.pdf

Not a very favorable report - a distribution list of over 40 names in the government.


The second report concerning a physical examination of one of the units:

http://nlectc.org/pdffiles/dklanalysis.pdf





diamondjim - you have claimed to have seen and used these devices first hand. In your opinion - did they work as claimed? The Sandia evaluation seems very credible and I'm starting to worry.

I found out about this stock at my friend's wedding. His bride's sister's fiance (I know that sounds rediculous) (second note - this guy is from Rhode Island and I saw someone on this board reference people from that state before - makes me wonder if we are talking about the same people) recommended this stock to me. At first I didn't trust him when I found out this was a penny stock, but I later found out through my friend that many of the people attending the wedding were heavily invested in this stock. They and the person who recommended this stock were successful business people, so I began to give the stock credibility, thinking that these people would not invest in a bogus company.

But now conflicting evidence is starting to surface. If nnsr is potentially merging with what seems like a bogus company, either they are poor at making business decisions or bogus themselves.

I'm asking anyone who might have insight on this to inform the rest of as to what is really going on with these companies. I guess I could call Josh Moser or Ted Wong and ask them, but do I really expect them to say "Whoa, you caught us. Guess the jig is up."?