InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

dsdectector

04/17/07 3:09 PM

#5311 RE: reallybadtrader #5310

And there's nothing, not one shred of evidence whatsoever to suggest that what you're saying is happening with this company. To accuse the management of being inept is quite a bit different that charging that they're crooks. I think you went way out on a limb with that post. You've suggested that they're involved in criminal activity. That's nutty.

Frankly, the way things have played out here has gotten everyone's goat. It has taken much longer than they suggested. They are to blame for people's dissatisfaction and must accept that they are perceived by many to be incompetent.

We should have a clear idea within the next six months if this company is going to begin fulfilling its promise. They were quite clear in their revenue projections. If they fail to meet those numbers, we're at a buck. If they meet them or exceed them, and show promise moving forward, the pps goes up.

These projections are quite a bit different from backchannel rumors. They were issued by the company and they damned well better deliver. I assume they know this.

But to suggest that they are colluding with the investors to run it into the ground is preposterous. The insiders own most of the shares.

I'm more concerned with what it's gonna cost the company to get those revenue figures. They have a history of outspending their revenues. Will it cost 33 million to make 25 million? Or will it break even? Make a few cents a share? How will it be valuated then? Conventionally? Or as a growth company? What kind of multiple will we be talking? Are the revenues starting to come in now? How much cash do they have on hand? These are the questions that many people have with this company even now, and in my opinion, explains why we're still trading here.

bsd