Replies to post #62099 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[chiggah]

Froggie,

"spit-slinging nitwit". Hmmm. So you have started to call out names and I am the one who is throwing the tantrum, eh?

I have folliowed the thread. Maybe you should read my post a little closer. When people speculate without any facts, you perpetuate it, at the very least. I never said you started it.
I guess that being the intelligent king-of-the-mountain here doesn't necessarily hold you to any higher standards.

I do apologize for one thing, though.
I meant to say " an electrical engineer who THINKS he's a securities analyst, banker, accountant, dna scientist, and inheritant of a higher developed gene pool"

Over and out.

[johnnyfiber]

frog,

This thread started with pumpers talking about WHEN DNAP pharmaceutical was spun off, existing shareholders would get 20X their current shares. (Which by the way is sheer nonsense.)

Frog, you are absolutely correct.