InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

starboy

04/16/07 3:39 PM

#8797 RE: zguy #8796

Today's PR sure said a lot about Hemi's drilling capabilities.
Volume resurgence today as well to accompany the news.

icon url

TheApprentice

04/16/07 4:11 PM

#8800 RE: zguy #8796

The wells I'm thinking of would have been offsets to existing production, in-field drilling, or even wildcats. Production gradually reduces formation pressures, resulting in less future production. We were working at quite a bit greater depths and hence had greater pressures to start with. I tried to peddle prospects in eastern Kansas to our company (prospected as far east as the Winterscheid pool, which is still west of Hemi's area) but this part of the state was derided as the "stripper area", i.e. too shallow, full of decrepit old non-productive wells, and not worth botheering with.

I wasn't involved with well completions but I don't believe they did much more than acid treat formations like the Mississippian (limestone, dolomite). I believe that Hemi's modern completion/stimulation techniques are what make all the difference.

As I understand it, Hemi is focused on old-field redevelopment rather than wildcat drilling. If they can bring in a 68 BOPD well in an 80 year old field, they don't need to do very much wildcatting at long odds.
icon url

icemann

04/16/07 8:06 PM

#8809 RE: zguy #8796

Consider, ZGUY, that the Mississippian formation isn't a mature formation on our leases. It's "virgin" as far as I can see. Deeper, but still cheaply drilled. Imagine what it will add to the proven reserves when we elect to pursue it!!! I think the Mississippian formation is one of those DD2 has been alluding to in his messages regarding geologic formations.