Replies to post #1999 on DC Brands International, Inc. (fka HRDN)

[boogaloo]

flaflyers, Thanks for that. Wow, I guess there was some spam rag action on this. I hadn't seen any myself, until just now, that I recall.

[Arch Stanton]

Are these what the SEC suspened for? I thought they were looking for the SPAM mails that I get almost everyday that say things like 500% gains guarenteed in 1 week, no disclaimer, just BS.
I had seen most of these PR type releases, and Spanination posts that the company disputes the SPAM accusations.
For some it is probably hard to discern the difference between 500% guarenteed in 1 week and a PR type release stating that potential for growth with disclaimer.

Then again I don't see a need for the company to spend anything on this type of PR, when sales and profit are the best PR for investors.
I can still feel the potential of this company, they have a superior product at a much lower cost, with great marketing potential.

[Andromedus1]

I looked at every one of your links, and not a single one of them are of DCBI spamming, all are of third party spams. Can you point out a single one of these that is a legitimate, paid for by DCBI, spam? Because I cannot. As a matter of fact, each one individually explains that it is not. The fact that DCBI has been spammed by third parties is no surprise, I had not seen it but I had heard that it was confirmed several weeks ago.

What is the overall purpose of this post? God forbid it be to take advantage of the investors who are too lazy to actually click your links.

[droneputt]

Sounds like a real reputable company, not. TheSUBWAY is posting information they THINK is reliable, but is not guaranteed to be ACCURATE?

I think I will stop investigating the rest of the post.

Quote from link #2:
All material herein was prepared by Capital Research Group, Inc. (TheSUBWAY) based upon information believed to be reliable. The information contained herein is not guaranteed by TheSUBWAY to be accurate, and should not be considered to be all-inclusive. The companies that are discussed in this opinion have not approved the statements made in this opinion.