InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

uwlungman

04/11/07 11:28 AM

#10204 RE: vlftraders #10200

vlf. Thanks. That's pretty much what jrdig7 surmised. eom...
icon url

annaclarke

04/11/07 11:31 AM

#10205 RE: vlftraders #10200

So in order to reduce our shares, we need to increase them by 58 million or so.

Makes sense to me, Im going to start buying again. All you newbies should do the same.
icon url

dallavise

04/11/07 11:31 AM

#10206 RE: vlftraders #10200

Very cool, vlf. Basically nothing has changed, and we all get a good opportunity to pick up cheap shares. Sounds good to me.
icon url

Shamantiks

04/11/07 12:06 PM

#10234 RE: vlftraders #10200

Well how does that work? Why could you possibly have to ADD shares to REMOVE shares? It's not like we're dealing with matter and anti-matter. As stated before, the dividend only requires 6 million shares, not 60 million. The new 60 million are listed as free trading shares too, which is troublesome.

Personally I'm really pissed this comes as a surprise with no explanation from the company. All bashing aside, this is unprofessional of XTMS and is the first thing they have done to dissapoint me.
icon url

xsurfbum

04/11/07 9:46 PM

#10327 RE: vlftraders #10200

NICE, Thanks for that post. I knew these guys weren't your typical pink( Say one thing and do whatever they want ), XTREME is the REAL DEAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!