Replies to post #53162 on e.Digital Corporation (fka EDIG)

[Sentinel]

CAL LAW...Where did moxa say he actually saw the unit? I missed that in his post. From what I read, the source was ambiguous. Hopefully moxa can clear this up for us soon.

[owd3]

And you guys wonder why I spend my time here?? Where else can I see someone like Cal Law rant for DAYS about how people should only post verifiable facts that can be backed by solid DD. And then have that same person turn around and post an unsubstantiated rumor as a fact:

"Posted by: CAL_LAW
In reply to: Cassandra who wrote msg# 53157 Date:12/2/2003 3:18:50 PM
Post #of 53286

Cassie: once again you are wrong. Moxa posted that he actually saw the Gateway player and confirmed that:
"In reply to: owd3 who wrote msg# 53103 Date:12/2/2003 10:16:09 AM
Post #of 53117

The names e.Digital and MicroOS are seen on the boot up of the Gateway device.

Hope this helps."


Then his "source" backpedals:

Posted by: moxa1
In reply to: None Date:12/2/2003 6:16:54 PM
Post #of 53289

I should have stated that it is rumored that the names e.Digital and MicroOS are seen during the boot up phase in Gateway's player. Time will tell.

Sorry!"

Seriously, how FUNNY is that? One would have to assume that Cal law has what is commonly referred to as a "double standard"!!!!

Plus, does anyone wonder why this is a rumor at this point? Surely someone has one at this point, right? A mean Niz stated they were going to be in stores last week, right? Can't someone just turn theirs on and see? I mean was Niz wrong about what he claimed as "fact"?