InvestorsHub Logo

DEMO P2

04/04/07 7:31 AM

#4397 RE: al44 #4396

al44 i 100% agree with you. I was in this stock for only a few months earlier this year and i have come away with the same feeling. i invested thousands after seeing the many many positive prs about wtvi. to my surprise after each pr the price would drop rather than go up. most stocks go up on good news and down on bad news. wtvi goes down on all news. i as well was very positive on this stock when i owned it. i came to find out later that the management was not doing business in the favor of share holders but rather in favor of the management only. i do not want to bash but please think long and hard before putting your money in wtvi. i lost 10s of thousands thinking this company was on the level. please do not make the same mistakes i made. al44 is a fair and decent mod, he as well is a great person to ask about wtvi.

glta

joelegs

04/04/07 9:46 AM

#4398 RE: al44 #4396

Well said and thanks.

Best regards,
JL

camguy99

04/06/07 2:17 AM

#4440 RE: al44 #4396

Al44, I agree with you about the 700% gain about 8 years ago but please qualify that point. Meaning, that was the hey day of the pre-internet bubble burst. You could literally throw a dart at any internet stock and it would be one that had double digit gains on a weekly basis. That time, era, was an anomaly and it is gone. WTVI, along with literally hundreds of other upstarts, tanked in 2000-2002 and many have disappeared completely.

There is nothing on the horizon that would remotely indicate a rise in stock price for WTVI. Please, with the trend of reverse spilts, name changes and the amount of outstanding shares vs income and future (real) deals (NOT), there is definately a pattern to the facts of DD and it points down.

I just hate to see people make the same mistake I did, wanting to believe in a company because of their idea, which is a good one I might add, only to get distracted by hype and blindsided by reality. For me it was getting caught up in the internet-hype craze. Currently for WTVI sharholders, its Al's incessant pumping of PR's. ---though he has always done that---and look at what it has gotten for the shareholder!

Yeah WIFI-TV is a good idea. But, so were the 300 plus car companies that started out in America in the early car era. Barely 3 exist today and WTVI is not one of them.

Most of all, don't forget the numbers. Please, someone explain how shareholders can ever profit (other than day trading) with these current numbers? Better yet, tell me one public company who has profited (icluding reverse splits and symbol changes) given a scenario like WTVI?





WALL STREET KID

05/20/07 9:14 PM

#4952 RE: al44 #4396

Great post, I made my post in reply to 50cents post. I have both made money and lost it and do not see any benefits in being a longterm long shareholder, my post was simply a buyer beware with a link to it's fiancials. But thnx anyway