InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Cytotekk

04/03/07 6:36 PM

#3844 RE: ironyman #3843

Yes Irony, I think your 1 for 100 rs is a good guess, but I do not know AND I still do not have the Chinese information about the Company wanting to take this over.

I called him twice this morning. Not here yet.
icon url

jolyn86

04/03/07 6:52 PM

#3846 RE: ironyman #3843

ironyman "existing shareholders are subject to a 1 for 100 reduction"

Odds are it will be 1 for 2000

Should I hold off fileing with the SEC any longer?

IMO Thank you Jolyn

icon url

Cytotekk

04/03/07 7:32 PM

#3851 RE: ironyman #3843

Oh, and I left out,"as the FrogQueen", that screwing will probably be alright as long as it is a ROYAL SCREWING, I am the FrogQueen after all, I should always get a Royalscrewing.

Gross humor aside Irony,

I feel better about this deal after ALL THE TIME I spent researching this when I should have been finishing my taxes!

Stop thinking this is a bad deal until we get more information...




icon url

rrufff

04/04/07 4:55 PM

#3880 RE: ironyman #3843

Irony - I don't disagree with the essence of what you are saying but just the precision of the terms.

Reverse split is different from reverse merger. The latter typically means a private company takes over a public company and becomes the public company. Although it looks like the other way around, hence "reverse."

A reverse split, is a totally different topic.