Don't make such assumptions and then attribute them to me.
I said suits, not Jim Dial.
I specifically did NOT say Jim Dial.
I specifically DID say suits.
The GFCI shareholder meeting was in part, a strange event.
Now what if Jim Dial is caught in a bizarre crossfire
so to speak between the suits and other extraneous factors?
This is a hypothesis.
I've learned there are so many factions in this melodrama,
it is quite unbelieveable except, they do exist. They seem
to have the most bizarre effect on the circumstances
surrounding GFCI.
What I find is: JD is at the center of an unnatural storm which
by my DD, I find slowly being sorted out (at this time).
I may not agree with the JD's methodology, but I'm not him.
Again, this is a hypothesis to explain some GFCI events.
JD and or events may prove me right or wrong.
We'll only know in time.
I'm currently a curious observer with the ability, means
and patience to see how this turns out and have passed
no judgement. I know enough to know it would be incorrect for
me to currently pass judgement. Therefore, I am not bashing.
I am entitled to my opinion whether it is appreciated or not.
I am entitled to propose any hypothesis I suspect is correct.
I am entitled to watch as others disagree.
I am entitled to not engage and debate with dissenters.
I am entitled to ignore whom I choose.
I am entitled to wait and see if events prove me right
rather than post every piece of GFCI DD I have found.
I went and saw the very GFCI tools that were posted once to
not even exist and was served derision.
I will not reward such behavior by offering any DD of mine
except what I choose when I choose in the manner I choose.
"known to a publicly held copororate officer."
What's a "copororate officer" ? (just joking)
It IS funny if you try to say it out loud.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
