WhyNotTry....I'll give it a whirl:
1) Has anyone been able to get the exact physical address of the plant under construction? I know someone has mentioned they live close and would be willing to give updates. However, I have not been able to get this information
*****************************************************
I have not seen the specific address, but the Business Plan has this to say about it:
Locations & Facilities
The first facility is located in the Three Rivers region, in Quebec, Canada where an existing building has been acquired. The facility, comprised of an existing 25,000 square foot building situated on a 370,000 square foot lot located in the Parc Industriel et Portuaire de Bécancour, offers a convenient location with rail access adjacent to the building and direct access to Highway 30, situated at less than ¼ mile from the facility. It also offers an existing liquid terminal for manipulation, storage and loading of finished products on site and with connection to the port’s liquid terminal. An adequate pool of qualified labor is also available in the same location. The existing infrastructures represent an important asset, not only in terms of cost savings but in terms of time savings as well and will allow expanding to reach the planned production capacity of 120,000 metric tons per annum within the same facility and existing infrastructure.
****************************************************
2) How much debt do we have? If none; why not leverage with debt for bigger returns (no need to issue more shares) for the current shareholders? If the technology is real; I would think financing would not be difficult.
****************************************************
No financial information is available as far as I know. Regardless, financing appears to have been put in place in the form of the acquisition deal with the Siam guys. Why use debt when you have a deep pockets group behind you. Now all we have to do is hope they are "real". LOL
****************************************************
3) Has anyone been able to get contact information for the company(s) that initially provided the valuation? Verification of this company and their reputation could go far.
***************************************************
The company was supposedly called CLD. I tried doing both a web search and sending email to IR about that. No results from either action, so I am clueless about CLD.
*****************************************************
4) How can ACMG provide the financial forecast without some understanding of the current accounting problems? It is my understanding the reasoning for not issuing audited financials is due to problems with the shell company....how are we confident the shell company is not carrying large amounts of debt or other problems? If the accounting is that bad, I would not feel comfortable issuing a forecast. Also, how bad could the problem be...I have personally been involved with the "restructuring" of VERY large publicly traded companies which have experienced "accounting problems" and it did not take this long (Alcar has no substantial accounting at all...to my knowledge).
****************************************************
Good question. Out of my league on that one.
****************************************************
5) I realize this question is hypocritical (considering I am an investor with questions), but why is so much of the website dedicated to investors versus the technology/marketing...specifically note the "Products" page lack of information. This is concerning to me.
******************************************************
I believe the website is geared toward investors because that is who would be accessing it most. I imagine licensees, etc. would want a face to face meeting, and I imagine any serious talks with same would require disclosing information about the processes, which would mandate a Non-Disclosure Agreement at the very least IMO. ACMG is still filing for patents, so I would think it only natural that they don't give away much on the website technology-wise. That site is, IMO, a way of anticipating what investors might want to know, and giving it to them. The technology will either prove itself with licensees or it won't. A "technical" website wouldn't change that.
*******************************************************
These are just my opinions. Hope they help a little.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
