Replies to post #113849 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[JPetroInc]

We're talking about 2 different sources. Hence the possible disparity. Also, I don't want to come to any conclusions about yhea's or nay's, at least not until all the votes are in. Simply stated, this is a big deal, as it will cast an international footprint for all PWC players to use one set of standards worldwide...maybe with the exception of Japan and NTT DoCoMo, who are out in front of the rest of the world in PWC adoption.

All the Best, JP

[kokonutguy]

Tim did also say the area is highly fragmented when it comes to barcodes (1d and 2d) and that in order to get in on the action quicker, a standard must be agreed upon. Another reason why the MMA had gotten so many people on board is to help create a standard (and understanding) on how to reach the market using ads on their customers' cell phones without offending them. And that would be the pull marketing strategy and get them engaged instead. It's better to attack it now (ie standardization) when it comes to the mobile marketing space than to have it too large to handle 3, 4 or 5 years down the road when fragmentation is even worse.

The quicker the adoption, the quicker people will warm up to the mobile marketing space, and the quicker companies (especially the carriers) will see the money.

[beam11]

Well, hummmm, where is that post or your DD, which gives Walek & Associates, control over what Tim of HP, can and can not do?

Don't think that Tim of HP and Walek and assocaites are related, are they? Did I miss something here?

JP posted - that Walek and Associates are holding back releasing anything regarding MC2---------------

Jonesie posted - in spite of Tim saying otherwise-------- that he would be posting a summary of the meeting.

Since HP appears to be much in charge here - IMO, HP should be in charge of presenting a summary of the meeting vs any other company.

As for putting words in the mouth of others (causing confusion by your interpretation of silence and no specified date to provide a summary), as in stating- "No they did not reach a consensus", it appears to me, that you may have, again, overstepped your bounds of assuming the facts, in lieu of waiting to read the facts.

As far as your statement, "seems an easy enough thing to accomplish" - (regarding a consensus), well, no it may not be, or maybe it was. The fact of the matter, we do not know what the facts are until we read a summary of the meeting.

So, why the hurry to prejudge what Tim of HP may state?

I do not understand why you would use the words "in spite of Tim saying otherwise". Why would Welek & Associates attempt to "spite" Tim of HP, by "not" presenting a NEOM PR on the MC2?

It appears to me that, NEOM, should not discuss the MC2 meeting, before Tim of HP, puts out a summary.

Was the sarcastic tone of your post intended to confuse us, or was it intended as a slap in the face of JP (again), for relating information from Walek and Associates?

I appreciate the post from JP, and I appreciate your previous information regarding a summary to be presented by Tim of HP.

I just can not determine what all this is "in spite of"! If you can tell me I would appreciate your doing so.