InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

CFlynn

03/10/07 2:06 PM

#266017 RE: Seminole Red #265994

"FOS"? Hmmm, at least I'm not "full of Fish"!

Diamonds, please read my statements before you misquote me. :) I never said "Top Positions", I said some former Q employees had been successful at other companies since moving on. Success is not defined by level of position, but by their performance in their particular area. I was saying it shows the quality of a lot of the people (non-Team Olsen/Team Fan) we had working in those positions at Q.

As for specifics, again, I'm not going to start putting everyone's personal information (including my own) on an open forum where there are still people hostile to us.

Sorry if that doesn't answer a question, but anybody who claims we're "FOS", again, has their own agenda against us and wants you to believe that. Over and over I have said, if you have any doubts about anything we've said here, much of it can be verified by reading the complaint (lawsuit) filed by the labor commission.

icon url

marketbear

03/10/07 2:33 PM

#266019 RE: Seminole Red #265994

Red, I have to say, anyone who claims to speak FOR "Q" unless its Fan or Gouviea, is FOS.......but there are many people out there qualified to speak ABOUT "Q", because they were there and saw soom of what happened daily and what the fall-out was.
icon url

Reddog65

03/12/07 10:57 AM

#266036 RE: Seminole Red #265994

Just because Q doesn't exist anymore doesn't mean they aren't qualified to discuss what went on when they were there.

Why do you insist on antagonizing these people who were hurt just as much as the shareholders? And I'm not talking about the ones who made out like bandits. I'm talking about the former employees who held on til the last second trying to make something of not only their career, but YOUR investment.

Quit harrassing them. It is totally unwarranted.