InvestorsHub Logo

Sentinel

11/13/03 7:00 PM

#51242 RE: Cassandra #51240

I thought I was pretty fluent in English, but I didn't read all that into it at all. I better get paranoid, and FAST, if I'm gonna survive.

Tinroad

11/13/03 7:08 PM

#51250 RE: Cassandra #51240

Just my opinion, but it seems that you are readily blindsided. You have greedily seized upon the acknowledged fact that Digitalway did the industrial design for the O 1000. That fact in no way reduces EDIG's ownership of the O 1000 platform. The new OEM is free to produce their own version of that platform; IMHO the cosmetic and internal differences between the two products are sufficient to make Gateway's version a unique industrial design owing nothing to the Dway version.

murgirl

11/13/03 8:56 PM

#51285 RE: Cassandra #51240

Casandra wrote:"Posted by: Cassandra
In reply to: Sentinel who wrote msg# 51235 Date:11/13/2003 6:58:30 PM
Post #of 51280

The design, which you posted that RP says EDIG owns (which was contrary to my understanding). As you can see from all of the other statements about agreements, management is not at all shy about embellishment. However, the statement about the OEM is surprisingly sparse and omits details they usually like to highlight. One can attempt to draw inferences, but the statement does not confirm them.

Just my opinion, but I got the impression from what they said, that the deal is much less significant financially than even I previously thought.


~Cassandra

which was contrary to my understanding)
Well that explains a LOT!

the statement about the OEM is surprisingly sparse and omits details they usually like to highlight.
Ever heard of NDA'S?!

Just my opinion

Once again..your opion is PROVEN to be wrong on a daily basis!