InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

loanranger

08/26/24 9:11 AM

#146284 RE: mike41 #146282

That's a mistaken belief. And it's not an "alleged" letter.....I posted the link to the exchanged correspondences here:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174910356
icon url

MiQuant

08/26/24 11:03 AM

#146287 RE: mike41 #146282

The ruling on "Chevron" involved interpretations of laws/rules that contain amiguity. Accroding to the ruling, courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws. In the case of the SEC Letter. There is no ambiguity, since its ONLY related to data when SAFETY and EFFICACY do exist in medical/medicines products according to the review panels and scientific guidelines and procedures.