Replies to post #132185 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[sunspotter]

"There are many reasons cases could be dismissed, isn't there?"

Yes, but with VPLM it's always like this:

"FINAL JUDGMENT
At the Final Pretrial Conference held July 9, 2024, the Court announced on the record that
(1) Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Amend Answer to Add
Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 88) is GRANTED; (2) Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions Based on
VoIP-Pal’s Violation of Court Order (Dkt. No. 219) is DENIED; and (3) Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Dkt. No. 136) is GRANTED. The Court issued a
written opinion granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement on July
29, 2024. Dkt. No. 272. The Court now enters its Final Judgment as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that final judgment of non-infringement is entered in favor of Defendant
and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing in this action.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any and all motions not previously ruled upon by the
Court are DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s remaining counterclaims and defenses
are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s defenses to Defendant’s remaining
counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice.
Case 6:21-cv-00674-ADA Document 273 Filed 08/15/24 Page 1 of 2
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant may file a motion for attorney’s fees and
costs, with supporting documentation in accordance with Local Rule CV-54(b)(2), within the time
frame prescribed by the Local Rules.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the
case.
SIGNED this 15th day of August, 2024"

[nyt]

I don't know if there are many, but I'm sure there are numerous reasons. All I said was there were numerous dismissals, not just 1 as someone suggested and it doesn't seem to be the right direction to be going, in getting all these dismissals...?