Replies to post #4 on XENOLIX MINING (fka XTCI)

[Alvie2]

It's me, Hans, still hanging in and "optimistic", if that's an acceptable word in the DD language.

We may be getting to Holland sometime in January, and if so would like to see you and Wies. Send me your email address by private response and let's keep in touch.

Alan

[kzetmeir]

Hi, Hans ...

Welcome to the Thread.

I wish I had some really positive news to convey ... but I don't.

Mostly, I have questions ... which our Management has conveniently ignored.

Although I don't know what Amundsens would have done with MGAU ... it's apparent we gave away half a company based upon expectations that have proven to be grossly over optimistic.

I thought when Rick "The minority shareholders have a Champion on the Board now!" Childress became active in the company things might change a bit. Alas!

IMHO, the ACC MUST levy some kind of fine on XTCI. If they don't ... then they must shoulder responsibility for shareholders losing millions of dollars based upon their unfounded trumped up charges. The stock is down about 75% when they started their BS. Without so much as a PhD Geologist on Board, let alone anyone who can so much as spell NANO ... they've set themselves up as judge and jury over the success of a high tech R&D effort.

If they don't levy a fine or find serious misdoings (which is quite possible!) ... then I'm for a class action suit against them.

BTW ... for those who don't know me, and I received some crap on RB ... I'm one of the Founding PP Holders in MGAU and have approx. 100K shares ... needless to say I'd love to see Management pull this one out.