At 1st glance, all warm and fuzzy, but veiled and incorrect. It's true that all the info is out there for the gathering, but the notion that all the same info that IS gathered is the same or equal, is far from the case. If you were a BORG and part of the collective, like the big dog alleged infringers are depicted as here, then you would be of one mind and one voice and all of you in the collective would automatically reach the same conclusions. The reason I say the alleged infringers are depicted that way is because all the pro vplm peeps here have said the same thing, (I guess making them BORG as well) and that is that they all (the alleged big dog voip service providing infringers) all decide the best way to be heads of these companies is to steal the patents....every last one of the companies and as their best sense of Fiduciary duty, after they all steal the patents, then to refuse to buy, license, settle, or partner up, as the most fiduciary thing to do. And ea and every one does the above with the assured idea that they will this way bleed the patent owners to death, disregarding of course, in the case of Vplm, that vplm has clearly demonstrated their ability to raise every cent necessary for the fight (or whatever it is that they are really doing...). Oh, and since you can't truly believe they are part of the BORG collective, then you must therfore conclude that the above corporate decisions are all RANDOM
Now back to your equal dissemination and processing of the wide world of info out there, that we all have access to...
The reality of the situ is that we all have extremely wide varied ways and skills at how we do our DD. Thus the bottom line, quite obviously, is that the info available and the various info gathering methods is about as far and wide as the cosmos and in most cases and in my opinion, the only times that 2 of you come up with the exact same conclusions, which you then feel you are licensed to deem it as FACT, is usually only when it's 2 peeps who have a need and desire to agree with ea other in the face of the sea of discontent and disagreement they are constantly surrounded by. You know, a kind of butt kissing goes on in that regard quite often, as ppl seek those who agree with them. This forum is used more as a social platform, or at least as much, as it's intended purpose, which few seem to be aware of what that is and they become snarky and clique-y and hateful and ruden to fellow posters, all of whom have as much right and reason to partake here as they do, regardless of their sentiment in the stock.
I've done 13 yrs worth of careful and meticulous DD on this play as well as formed many of my own conclusions and opinions. And I try to discern and make known which is which. I have intelligently supported every one of those ideas and theories and conclusions with what I deek to be logical and sensible thoughts.
For that they sling "gibberish", "nonsense", "drivel", "stupid", etc and try to say I'm things I'm not and shouldn't be here. Guess they had another think coming, didn't they?
It's all good... All my conclusions and predictions have either come true 100% or at least held up for years and years with zero been proved wrong.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
