Sunspotter you may be correct, however, I don't believe that Emil and the law firm representing VP would go to the expense, time and trouble to pursue infringement litigation in a court of law, while knowing that their case was bogus, merely to fleece shareholders out of pennies while leaving dollars on the table. According to your hypothesis, VP'S lawfirm was either duped (which would mean that they are naiive) or that they were participants in this alleged "scheme" (which would mean that they knowingly broke the law), neither theory of which I find credible. The shareholders need a statement from the company to confirm or dispel the many rumors being floated by folks with, frankly, no equity positions in the stock.
Bullish
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
