InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Gtc_123

07/19/24 11:58 AM

#47067 RE: Mojocash #47066

Yikes. Wonder where the pumpers will be on this one.
icon url

work-n-hard

07/19/24 12:44 PM

#47068 RE: Mojocash #47066

If true, No wonder the Redgear partners were trying highjack their old accounts...possibly to protect their old clients &/or their reputations.
If you saw my post yesterday about the PACER lawsuit, the old partners have counter sued. Wonder if this is in that counter suit?
I tend to believe what this guy is saying, because in his video posted on X concerning his reason for the 07-16 filings, he is not above manipulating filings/records in order to avoid the consequences of his failures.
This is just My OWN OPINION. We will know for sure, when the facts come to light.
Thanks for this post.
icon url

Skynet11

07/19/24 1:40 PM

#47069 RE: Mojocash #47066

Well that’s not good…
icon url

SF971

07/19/24 2:37 PM

#47070 RE: Mojocash #47066

“Absolutely.
Nothing to do with the audit in the slightest. The audit delays are a complex transaction adding on an acquisition that kept very little records. These remarks are from a former employee who was terminated. In my opinion, this was retaliatory, and was voluntarily submitted (not subpoenaed). That should say something right there. Unfortunately, the RedGear acquisition needed to be entirely audited to complete the YCRM audit. My team has at times been left with guesswork on what exactly will satisfy the auditors, gone days without response while they review, and piecemeal information together to reconstruct transactions from very sloppy accounting of the former owners.”
icon url

mrrickjordan

07/19/24 8:04 PM

#47077 RE: Mojocash #47066

She writes better than their lawyer