Yes, Butters, and I will go one step further and assert that UNTIL there is a court win, no formal or legal proof of any infringement would exist. There would only be allegations and assertions by the abused party, which would do little to enhance the value of VP's IP, and provide less in terms of leverage in negotiating future settlements. Nothing could enhance the market value of VP's IP like a jury verdict finding in favor of Voip-Pal. Even an award in the millions (if not billions) would say to the other infringers that VP is a force to be reckoned with. Thus, it stands to reason that I am hoping VP's leadership will see this very strong and winnable case through to a trial next month.
JMHO.
Bullish