Lmfao, what do you think this means? Maybe you should re-read it as looks like you think it's good for Trump as otherwise you would not have posted it.
Maybe I should explain it to you. This lawyer, Adam Leitman Bailey. claims he approached the judge presiding over Donald Trump’s civil fraud case to offer unsolicited advice about a law at issue in the case. The Judge impropriety and said he was “wholly uninfluenced” by Mr. Bailey.
So Trump's lawyers seized on the allegations.
So Trump's lawyers have subpoenaed Bailey. You think that should be it right ? Baily made the allegations.
Well, guess what? Baily made a motion to quash the subpoena. The two sides went back and forth over the motion. On Friday, Bailey filed again .LOL
Baily does not want to co-operate with Trump's lawyers. Why?