Way over my head but the most detail I have seen thus far. Interesting though is that these revisional patents confuse the hell out of your general retail investor. Who is on first? And what about loyalty vs. legality? Rittman has major interest in AVAI, GTCH gets credit for patent submission and the tech serves the interests of BNIX most assuredly. All independent entities. Specifically serving to build the web of AI integrated entanglement even more securely and then wishing to sell all its patents to yet another unknown business entity.
Don't mind me, I am as confused as ever...god forbid the need to travel the mind-built roads of the inventor's brains without GPS! Can I just have some green without knowing how it was made?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
