If you've seen either promotional activity or Caveat Emptor being mentioned in any fillings, please tell me which one so I can see it with my own eyes.
That's it... Never mentioned twitter or any other social media (I don't count those has being "official")
"Now you're discounting a communication that was on the company account listed in the Audit." (There is absolutely nothing about Caveat Emptor or Promotional activities in the Independent Auditor Report)
"Now your saying the opinion letter is invalid from the attorney, which is counsel that was mentioned as receiving the communication FROM THE OTCM that the promotional communication was external."
That's definitely not what I said...
The never said that the Attorney Letter was invalid...
It just never mentions anything about the reason for Caveat Emptor or the "External" promotional activities", just a placeholder statement about inquiring about Shareholders and promoters transactions etc.
The Counsel himself never stated that he received such communication from OTCM, the company Twitter DID...
They addressed all relevant aspects of the promotion, showed they had no way of benefitting, there was no unusual activity in bank account and blatantly said "we didn't do this ". That statement has basically no value...
People can say whatever they want, it doesn't make it true (If an independent investigation would have come to the same conclusion, that would be different)
I'm not being particularly tough on TXTM management, I just don't trust anybody, in general...
I know CE removal can take A LOT of time (usually that's because the issuer is not Proprietary quote eligible, it requires FINRA clearance of Form 211)
When Form 211 isn't required, it is usually much faster
I've seen at least 2 stocks get their CE removed in less than 3 months
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
