Not actually correct.For one, review my post Stickied at the top of this board. You will find refrece to a post made in public with this stated, and which the OTCM confirmed there was NO promotional activity by the company. So no mattet the opinionof conversationin any forums, that statement says no matrer what some may think, this was not what the OTCM saw as the cause. Fir some reason some dont wanna let it got , but there it is in black and white (literally) . Now , before you dismiss it ,understand it is required by SEC regs for a company to distance itself from external promotional activity via public as to not be held liable.
Secondly, there was literally an entire filing on 11/28/22 released addressing items surrounding the CE reguarding no share conversion, internal audits, and also references to the company addressing the " promotional activities" and counsel making "specific Inquires."
So yes, those issues were addressed in detail.
Whe know what caused this, company told us lo g ago dispite those who dint want to take note.
GLTU