InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

cowtown jay

06/13/24 11:25 PM

#42605 RE: US-JUSTICE #42602

Here again, I agree with a part of what you say. The SEC gave the crooks the playground to rip off the public. But I disagree that there are no share loans. You know that can't be right, because you recognize (from somewhere - me?) that a single entity owns 110M shares. So if Humanigen controls about 90% of their OS, then management aren't the crooks, and my only question is whether Taran, or the Humanigen/Taran entity, will benefit by the forced covering, whether prompted by a merger, or by a recall of the loaned shares, or both.

I think the SEC tried to squash this situation, especially if the NIH owns so much of Moderna. If so, will this bankruptcy judge allow Humanigen's assets to be transferred to the US Treasury? Or will he order those funds to be returned to Humanigen and the injured shareholders? More often than not, judges recognize the discretionary authority of the executive branch agencies. But, in this case, the judge may recognize a conflict of interest in the agencies, and disallow the discretionary authority to convert our funds to the Treasury Department.