InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PutzMueler

06/06/24 2:21 PM

#112923 RE: NavyHusker #112919

So we were told.

Didn't we just do some additional drilling in 2021 "in order to compile sufficient data with the aim of publishing an updated Mineral Resource



Why is this team always being reactive?
And
I wonder if 12 weeks equals 12 months for drilling results
icon url

OmniPro

06/06/24 4:42 PM

#112931 RE: NavyHusker #112919

NH: you're on it! EXIM wants further verification. It's obvious they don't trust MS....and neither do PE and institutional investors. Why no PE or institutional investment? MS has been misreprenting his whole career, and EXIM knows he's shady, but given the gravity of the geo-political circumstances, EXIM MIGHT finance Elk Creek if MS can further PROVE materials/elements are present TO THE EXTENT CLAIMED. Again, look at MS's record (MolyCorp/IBC). If you could back, knowing what you now know, would you invest right now? I wouldn't. But I'm underwater like everybody else still holding. I overlooked all of the deception/missteps/moving goal posts, believing in this project.....believing MS had some pride and would finally deliver on something, instead of driving everything in the ground (no pun intended), resulting in BK or serious devaluation. MS is a loser....and we were fools for trusting his snake-oil BS. Our ONLY hope is EXIM funding...in spite of MS, which may be difficult to overcome....he's a lying loser
icon url

Truth and Transparency

06/06/24 4:42 PM

#112932 RE: NavyHusker #112919

This smoke and mirrors BS is definitely getting old. Yet, there’s still a handful of investors who continue to praise management for their incompetence.

Wonder when the boys from Centennial will have a town hall in Nebraska again. It’s time to answer investors questions and concerns. They can’t dazzle investors with their bullshit anymore.