You're WAY more than a little confused. Think back to when you dropped out of HS; MORE confused than you were then.
I have no reason to doubt a conviction, notwithstanding your baseless, laughable, assertions about the law and the charges.
As for the grounds for appeal? I'll bet that they will be equally baseless and laughable.
Now, let's wait and see how the summations from both sides are rated by people who know the law.
The defense screwed the pooch when they put the nitwit on the stand who claimed the day before that emails 'speak for themselves' and then qualified it with 'sometimes' after an incriminating email of his was read to him by the prosecution, followed by a reading of his statement from the day before.