Replies to post #130312 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[VVVVVV]

Please read post # 130238, should help some. New witness would delay the August trial. Especially, that T-Mobile is opposing the same witness.

It would be a long explanation but, Hudnell argued points that if allowed would prejudicial for the jury.

IMHO

[DeerBalls]

$. 01635 The obvious answer is no, but I will explain! This is to you and anyone else without access to the filings, the inclination to read the filings(like me most of the time), nor the legal training to make a judgement.

The Hudnell filing was excellent because he is an excellent attorney; that's what he does! Guess what, the filings from the other side will be excellent as well, but the only judgement which matters is that of Judge Albright! VPLM is in great hands! Knowing every little detail of the farm that produces the wheat which goes into the bread is not necessary.

I would bet fewer than 5% of VPLM shareholders read all the files, or many. Not a big deal! I speak to many folks who, collectively, own 500mm+ shares at least. None that I'm aware of read the filings!

That being said, there are much, much bigger things going on and the excitement level has never been anywhere near this high! Stay tuned, I know you will!

Last note: did those damage estimates come out, cuz we've been working higher! Just kidding, we know the "damage estimates" aren't a huge thing for PPS!

Can you please explain why the latest Hudnell filing was excellent. I neither have the expertise or access to the filing. Thank you