Please read the filing and you’ll notice the new witness isn’t available until the week after the August trial. Therefore, Hudnell is asking for a continuance, possibly after the November trial. This is the paragraph before “conclusion”. Thus, causing a “possible” delay.
Now, with the additional motions filed yesterday by both defendants, they’re now opposing this substitute damages witness. Who knows what Albright will decide to do.
The filings are very telling, especially when they’re a day old. The finish line could possibly be delayed and the urgency to settle, as well.
But, if an acquisition is imminent, then this is all a moot point. lol
IMHO