Replies to post #23294 on NetList Inc (NLST)

[100lbStriper]

Stokd $NLST Regarding the Samsung doc few posted — some considerations are warranted given the timing and recent developments.

Samsung has filed numerous renewed stay motions in this case predicated on anything they can conjure up. Last one was denied Mar 11(top pic) and new one was filed May 13(mid pic), with today's being the redacted version—dated 5/13 by signature at bottom & Courtlistener description "Redaction to 702".

Think about it:
1-Samsung has filed and been denied all stay attempts based on numerous reasons.
2-Micron is in the same position with identical patents in the case and IPR status.
3-Gilstrap let Micron 294 case go to trial regardless.
4-Other reason for stay Samsung cites is the upcoming BOC trial may simplify case.
4-Samsung's new stay motion was filed BEFORE the BOC trial which concluded with a Netlist victory.

Meaning:
Absolutely no reason for Gilstrap to stay this case/trial while allowing Micron's to proceed... especially given the BOC win and Samsung being unlicensed.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573665000.png