Replies to post #794224 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[NeoSunTzu]

yeah, no shit. it needs to be written exactly in that simplified form with references to the documents containing the supporting information - somewhat like he is doing but much more more organized and without the crazed lipstick underlines and scribbles... a video would do wonders or sequential posts so it's not accounting financial statement regulatory soup - there are uncountable ways to improve what he is putting out there - its unorganized overload even for those interested and following ... one set of clear messages posted everywhere and consistently - then let's see where the investors and speculators take us

[stockanalyze]

premise? means nothing when there is no law, $1500 down to $0.40, many have died without seeing their hard earned retirement and 529 and rest of the shareholders struggling with sky high inflation while fannie mae and freddie mac making money hand and fist. can't wait for $5 mcdonald meal , even though for a month.

[Donotunderstand]

HAS ANYONE ---- even one ? - gone to court o this bullett issue !!

I am not sure i agree but that does not matter at all

F and F have paid - 250-300 B in cash (someone with exact #?)

To the best of my knowledge - every penny has been DEEMED and BOOKED as a dividend - be it the 10% or the NWS higher level some quarters

If that was illegal - what ever illegal means with our courts and F and F ---- then TODAY --- I mean TODAY F and F are free

But it requires some one with money - who agrees with the rationale to bring a case -- or its words on IH

[kthomp19]

His premise is actually quite simple. Dividends are capital distributions and as such they are restricted during conservatorship. No one has rights to dividends!

Therein lies the problem. The Supreme Court said that, in agreeing to the NWS, FHFA was allowed to ignore its conserve and preserve mandate due to the incidental powers clause that allows FHFA to act in its own interests. FHFA telling FnF to pay cash dividends during conservatorship is a part of the NWS.

Since the premise is invalid, any conclusions based on it are also invalid.