InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

bradford86

05/19/24 8:44 AM

#794158 RE: LuLeVan #794156

I tend to agree here. The commons are a gamble on write down. Which i think is a bet on warrant monetization to fund housing
icon url

Donotunderstand

05/19/24 9:36 AM

#794162 RE: LuLeVan #794156

why would capital level increase when SP is removed via conversion to other equity ?
icon url

Freddie bagholder

05/19/24 10:41 AM

#794167 RE: LuLeVan #794156

did you not sell off and go away? Why are you still lurking here?
icon url

The Man With No Name

05/19/24 11:04 AM

#794169 RE: LuLeVan #794156

I think you're wrong here. The capital levels (including CET1) increase by $191 billion when the SPS disappear from the balance sheet. It doesn't matter whether the SPS disappear by write-down or by conversion to commons.



The SPS aren't part of regulatory capital, per FnF SEC filings. Converting the SPS to Commons adds the conversion $ amount to CET1 capital.

This has to do with the ERCF, not balance sheet. You don't get the same benefit by making the SPS "disappear", which is never going to happen.