Replies to post #84207 on SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[learningthetruth]

Exactly!

[coccyx]

yep

[1984ISHERE]

Exactly mahatmapaul doesn't know what they are talking about

Could be a basher trying to curry favor, why else are they here?

[mahatmapaul]

doc : your post is partially true and partially untrue (in its implications, at least).

Yes, there is shorting and there is naked (illegal) shorting and the like, BUT NOT WITH STOCKS WHOSE PPS IS .008

The naked shorters (or other powerful shorting individuals or crews) target companies whose pps is much higher. It has to be. Just think of the mathematics of shorting @ .008 .... it's like putting 5 bullets in your smith and wesson and then playing russian roulette.

If you don't believe this, so be it. But, I'm not denying that naked shorting exists (its been proven in lawsuits many times over) nor that "bashing shorting" (NOT naked shorting) exists .... the latter are scum like intentional pumpers of scams. They do exist, but only in relation to stocks whose pps is much much much higher.

It's the .008 pps that we need to focus on when discussing whether spzi is being shorted.

You have a good day, but watch out for dca'ing in a falling knife of lower highs and lower lows. the mahat

[snow]

Good post dranes