Happy Mother's Day to the moms. The quote below, aimed at me, ALTHOUGH A TOTAL TWISTING OF WORDS, just adds to why I post next to nothing of what I dig up these days. I expect this out of government and not from someone who, due to my introduction, has a better position than he would otherwise have. I do speak to quite a few with what I dig up(spoke with Buster the other day and he seems well
I am the only one who has spoken to the "concentrate on the filings" comment that was made and how I differed with it. I said NOTHING about NOT paying attention to filings. I read the filings, but find them of very limited value. My guess is I've gained 90%+ of my VPLM knowledge from speaking with Rich and a few others, 5% from filings and about 5% from other sources. It ain't the public info which gives advantage in markets...the public info is available to everyone and please don't misconstrue my words in "insider info", I'm speaking of views and nuance.
I will be speaking with Rich a bit later today, but the suggestion the filings are so informative is a joke: How big a deal is this huawei deal? What are the ramifications of the deal? Hey, it's a good thing, no doubt, but there was a more beneficial action little more than a week ago. I'll get much more later today than what came in the filings.
Onward to "the "RUMORS" (that) you don't know about!! Pay attention to those. LOL!!!" Does that include:
ButtersOnARoll Re: None Monday, March 18, 2024 3:24:34 PM Post# of 129989 These 3 guys are big time execs. Clay P. has been with VP since its inception, is one of the original inventors of the VP patent family. So, he knows everything there is to know about the patented tech. Ray L. has been with VP in a similar capacity (mediations) since 2016 and may be assisting Bill P. there. BUT, Austin Mc is the new addition IMO. He's been a Director, COO/CEO for the last 20 years of his career and has the ability to run VPs things beyond WACO if needed:
"the final stretch towards monetization of our technology"
Just a thought, but the addition of these 3 could be setting up Emil to make an exit from VP as CEO after a major agreement (settlement/licensing/partnership) has been established. I would think he'd stay on as Board Chair, but is probably looking to make an exit as CEO after he establishes a first major agreement, buy out would be ideal, but if not. The newly added crew can run things from beyond WACO. Although, I could be wrong.
"Rumor"/speculation? Nah, just BULLSHIT coming from someone who isn't "blindly following VPLM anymore". Why would anyone "blindly follow" anything, ever? But, I guess some do...
I could grab others but that is enough for now.
As to "THE" top E.U. employer, huawei: The article comes from the huawei site and didn't say huawei "WAS THE TOP EMPLOYER IN EUROPE"; it said it was one of the top employers, coming out of an organization which, I would guess, is paid by huawei to say so, not unlike our "better business bureau".... Wow, what a schooling...NOT! Well, maybe from the schools these daz...
Re: ButtersOnARoll post# 129978 Saturday, May 11, 2024 1:26:35 PM Post# of 129989 But, just to be clear everyone, this deal between VP and Huawei, which was first reflected in the filings, isn't something you should be paying attention to.
IT'S THE RUMORS that you don't know about!! Pay attention to those. LOL!!!