InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

05/09/24 11:14 AM

#129915 RE: Str8t-talk #129913

The shares are worth what they buy and sell for but the patents themselves are worthless. They have proven that by never having made a dime since they were created. The only thing that's made money IS THE BULLSHIT STORY that you believe in.

Vplm creates shares out of thin air. It's called fiat shares. They are backed by zippo. Then they tell the shareholders and/or potential shareholders, big whopper stories to get them believing and buying. They also have taken many shares for themselves and sell them at great profits. That's known as the insider personal ATM.

The patents have no value whatsoever and that's why no one has ever bought them or licensed or settled in the near 20 yrs since they were allegedly created at a cost of 17 or 18 million dollars. The only entities who ever saw any value in them was digi-phony-ca and Vplm, who got rid of them as soon as they got them, realizing what a hot potato they were except Vplm hasn't been able to off them because that's not their true goal anyway. Their goal is to keep working the story and selling shares. They have done amazingly well at that.

straightword

05/10/24 8:25 AM

#129937 RE: Str8t-talk #129913

Yeah, patents worth .017 That's really something to get excited about isn't it. Are you really that desperate? Get back to me when they get financial judgements that are in-line with the "billions and billions of ongoing" infringements that the CEO has spoken about. If not then it's a complete failure and confirmation that the patents aren't worth near as claimed.

nyt

05/10/24 1:26 PM

#129943 RE: Str8t-talk #129913

No, it's a simple matter of delegating.. The shares are currently (not for long) worth .017. The patents are worth nothing. No one will buy them ever since they were created (except of course digi-phony-ca and Vplm). Not even license.. That is the true and undeniable test of value, ie, whether or not a product on the market, in this case, for many years...can sell OR NOT. VPLM is a definite OR NOT! The fact o matter is Vplm sells shares not patents. They couldn't sell a patent to a shoe leather company... Vplm is in the shares business and always has been. The patents, incl 573 ipr wins are nothing more than a story, a front to bounce off. Do you want to buy any Vplm patents?? Shareholders own shares not patents.