If "moving in the right direction" is the best that can be said after a year of working on the problem, I have little confidence in the next year.
I don't know of one, but I ask you - what prevents ownership from refiling under OTCM? Just need to file some unaudited fins and throw some money at the problem basically, yes? So, is there some practical, logistical, or operational reason they haven't? They believe an EM designation of 1.5 or 2 years is better than hopping back on OTCM until SEC reporting status is achieved ... if, indeed, it is even possible for them to achieve?
Help me understand.
I doubt this is a con. Don't see what they stand to gain at this point. On a personal note, I promise you all that if I con you out of any decent sum of cash, I won't sit around fucking with you for a year. Or a week. I will take your money & run.
No, this EM problem is ineptness, laziness, lack of concern, and/or a huge string of bad luck. All compounded by a group of owners who, like most men, can't communicate for shit. Quiet periods over ... lol.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
