Replies to post #360674 on ERHC Energy Inc (ERHE)

[badog]

I have a degree in psychology but I don't really care if you are delusional or not. You are entitled to think whatever you want...even if you can't back it up. I remember once when you called me out for using the word 'I' to many times in my post. LOL. I thought that was odd but it didn't really matter. I'm confident in what I believe.

Again, I will wait for my big payday but I am not holding my breath. If ERHC gets some kind of deal I figure I'll be lucky to get .01 or .02 / share. I mean there are a lot of shares outstanding. Every penny is $25 million dollars that ERHC has to show as profit or anticipated profit....not based on zillions of barrels of oil like people thought with the JDZ blocks. And it can't be pie in the sky accounting. Hell...most
of any revenues could be disposed of by management for things that don't benefit shareholders. They do what they want and disregard your desires.

If there were ever a payday I will not wait for your OK to cash in...as I would guess that others will not either. But IMHO It's still highly doubtful that there will be any cashing in. ERHC does not seem in a good position. They could end up with nothing. And still no one can show any proof of any shorts. That's what seems delusional to me. Short squeeze???? Not if there are no shorts.

Badog

[ssc]

Hmmmmm. Let's see, doesn't seem to take a rocket scientist or a psychiatrist - the definition of a delusional person:

A delusional person believes things that couldn't possibly be true. If you're convinced that the microwave is attempting to control your thoughts, you are, sadly, delusional. Delusional comes from a Latin word meaning "deceiving." So delusional thinking is kind of like deceiving yourself by believing outrageous things.

So believing that billions of erhe shares were shorted at $.0003 or lower and held for 5 years without being able to provide any proof or truth to support that belief OR

Claiming a libel suit was filed by erhc and could be found on the Harris County website when clearly there was no such suit or information on that website OR

Insisting an "African Queen" was going to buy erhe shares, paying up to $1/share and an epic, "Game Stop like" short squeeze would follow taking erhe to $8/share while the stark reality shows erhe remained near zero with near zero volume and no "African Queen" buying ever happened OR

Drawing a sketch of a head and believing it was erhe's largest short seller even though it was not a real person OR

Continuing to claim erhe will make you a billionaire as a short squeeze takes place that causes financial markets to crash even though, again, unable to provide proof any erhe short positions exist at all.

Now who just happens to fit the bill of a delusional person to a T? And who has been repeating those and many other such baseless claims, false rumors and outright lies for years and years? To put a twist on an old saying, if the dickran fits ... Regarding defamation, every definition I have seen starts with something false being said or written. Since all the examples listed above are true (as hard as that might be to believe), calling them delusional is quite accurate and might be the nicest way of describing them.

To avoid any confusion, an excellent example of defamation would be falsely stating that someone was slapped with a cease and desist order or letter while knowing full well that no such action ever happened. Now who would perpetrate such a dastardly deed? Once again, if the dickran fits...