So there is documented proof that what I say is correct and that you are wrong, but you will desperately, as usual, try to spin the info to make Calasse's chance sound better than they actually are.
I'm not wrong, and I don't have to desperately try to spin anything.
I can simply say you clearly don't understand what the US Court of Appeals is or how the judicial system works.
It renders your entire opinion invalid. Remember, stupid people have opinions too, but it doesn't make them useful.