When new research information arrives on Brilacidin often it is a preprint. Your reflex always is to demonstrate the new information is not peer reviewed. You want to say: maybe it is not good. Do you think this new information on Brilacidin will change a lot when it is peer reviewed? Do you think it is false? Do you have some example of Brilacidin preprints that changed a lot when it was peer reviewed or was false?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
