InvestorsHub Logo

bucks2pennies

04/22/24 1:27 PM

#21730 RE: OnceBurned #21729

You are definitely a greater person than I am! Believe it or not, given the length of your post, you accomplished a well-BRIEF summary of that obnoxious 10-K. I simply got sick when I attempted to do so. Much appreciated OB. Personally, I still think a buyout is a real possibility and another means of cleaning the slate of their toxic debt...rather than another patent sale... I favor a full-flush down the drain of ALL of their admin nightmare once and for all. Any company willing to do that has to have BIG balls! What a mess.

Porch Honkey

04/22/24 3:35 PM

#21734 RE: OnceBurned #21729

Nicely said, thank you for your input, and I agree with you.
Bullish
Bullish

MrMyers

04/23/24 10:15 AM

#21739 RE: OnceBurned #21729

Thank you for the summary!! I have a question regarding this sentence from the summary:

"So, in 2023, the holder of the IGOR Note received shares equal to 60% of the total O/S of the company, yet apparently never held--at any one time--more than 5% of the company's stock (which would violate the Note terms). "

Here's the question: What is the 5% max holding rule based on? "Approved shares"? The company is worth what the market is willing to pay (i.e., market capital). So, how can a lender own 60% of the stock yet own 5% or less of its value? In the case of the IGOR note, did the lender buy/sell no more than 5% of the company's stock at a time ... repetitively?

Appreciate you.
Bullish
Bullish