Replies to post #68752 on Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[I-Glow]

The Black Knight - it is merely a scratch.

Yolo keeps embarrassing you became Yolo posts facts and you post pinkyland wishful thinking.

Everyone is laughing at you and you have Zero credibility.

It is fun watching Yolo eviserates you with facts and you aren't smart enough to realize you have been worked.

But keep trying to pump the Sharp scams.

IG

[I-Glow]

Never once have you posted real DD - you only cherry pick parts you believe will help your agenda/narrative/false and misleading information.

You don't seem to understand that that the SEC smacked Sharp around when he attempted to steal the Calasse stock - Sharp has to issue a mea culpa and return the stock to Calasse and list them as issued and outstanding.

It is hilarious how you ignore facts as you whistle past the graveyard.

IG

[Yolo]

And it was the district court that mentioned the Calasse's "aid and abet securities fraud" part. Sharp's lawyer did not invent what the district court found, as you try to make it sound.

Are you really too stupid to follow what I have explained multiple times?

The judge didn't write anything. The court relies on both parties to draft and approve a judgment for the judge to sign. In this case, the judgment was exclusively drafted by Sharp's attorney and signed by the judge. Again, try reading the damn filings.

So yes, Sharp's lawyer controlled exactly what was included in the judgment, as I "try to make it sound." If you actually read my posts and weren't a freaking idiot, you would understand that by now.

[Yolo]

Maybe pictures will help. From the appeal brief appendix, here is a transcript of the first hearing. Notice what was discussed and what the judge said. Specifically, notice that he instructed the attorney to draft the order.



Now look at the district court decision, which was signed by the judge, but written by Sharp's attorney as I've repeatedly stated. Also notice that Calasse's attorney did not approve or respond to the email asking for approval, so it was submitted without her input.



Any further questions? Does that resolve your confusion?