LOL... another one that claims to be 'informed' but isn't. Surely you are aware that some of the so called' fact checkers' are nothing more than left leaning orgs designed to attack, smear the TRUTH TELLERS...
Its like the so called southern poverty law center run by commie party supporters who's real agenda is to smear and label conservative groups/orgs as 'hate groups' as part of the commie party agenda to convince people to not listen to them.
So who is van zandt?? Credible? I seriously doubt it, but at the same time, not surprised you are adamant that they are... cause again, you can't afford to let the TRUTH interfere with what YOU WANT, NEED to believe..
Today, PSI has issued Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) site owner, Dave Van Zandt with a pre-action legal notice to take down the defamatory and false smear.
Ironically, the self-styled ‘MEDIA BIAS/FACT CHECK‘ (MB/FC) which negatively fact-checked PSI admits it relies on subjective bias to decide how biased others are. In other words, MB/FC is a pseudoscientific fact checker!
Apart from unlawfully smearing PSI, Mr. Van Zandt has smeared other websites that publish scientific articles critical of man-made global warming claims. Among the unfairly smeared are:
Climate Change Dispatch CFACT WUWT (Watts Up With That?) Below we help readers to fact-check the pseudo-fact-checker. We put Dave Van Zandt the faceless fact-checker under the microscope and discovered the following:
Van Zandt Cites No Scientific Qualifications At All Van Zandt Was Exposed By WND As A Fraud And A Liar Van Zandt’s Website (MBFC) Does Not Apply Any Objective Scientific Method MBFC Relies On Unverifiable Subjectivity (Own Bias) To Make Judgments In a 2017 WND Exclusive ‘Phony baloney: The 9 fakest fake-news checkers’, Chelsea Schilling uncovered that Van Zandt was a seasoned systemic faker. She wrote:
“WND was unable to locate a single article with Van Zandt’s byline. Ironically, the “fact checker” fails to establish his own credibility by disclosing his qualifications and training in evaluating news sources.
Asked for information concerning his expertise in the field of journalism and evaluating news sources, Van Zandt told WND: “I am not a journalist and just a person who is interested in how media bias impacts politics. You will find zero claims of expertise on the website.”
Concerning his purported “25+ years” of experience writing for print and web media, he said: “I am not sure why the 25+ years is still on the website.”
With the increasing scourge of fake news reports, especially on matters of wider scientific interest, Principia Scientific International (PSI) has become a recognized source of highly qualified scientific opinion.
That scoundrels like Mr. Van Zandt get much traction with his bogus ‘fact-checking’ website is a testimony to the need for more diligence and pushback from honest scientists, other journalists, and citizens sickened by endless scientific fraud and misinformation.
Below we share with readers the take-down letter issued today to Mr. Van Zandt:
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
