Replies to post #68716 on Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[Yolo]

Enough said about your credibility concerning this topic.

It's a fucking typo! If you don't have the mental acuity to identify the mistake and still understand the sentence, then "enough said about your credibility concerning this topic." Or any topic, really.

Here is the fixed quote:

Because the facts show that Calasse was never accused of fraud by the SEC - they never filed a complaint against Calasse.

[I-Glow]

LOLOL! Actually I have a great deal of credibility because I don't pump scams and attempt to get others to lose their investment.

It was a typo - but you can't accept the facts that Sharp is using the Calasse lawsuit to keep dragging this scam out.

Why don't you address the facts that Sharp attempted to steal the Calasse stock but when filing the Form 10 in the SEC comments they made Sharp return the stock to Calasse. Are you denying this happened?

Any competent businessman would not have allowed the Calasse lawsuit to completely halt all operations on WNFT.

If there was a company wanting to do a merger the Calasse lawsuit would not have stopped it.

Sharp has never operated a successful business - business is about putting out fires and it daily. Sharp is too immature, insecure and too sensitive to be a successful businessman.

But you continue to pump with false and misleading information which is illegal - ComputerBux did the same thing and he was indicted by the DOJ for pumping on iHub and Twitter.

I was one of those doing real DD to expose the scam.

I have credibility with the SEC - they trust the reports I send them.

IG

[I-Glow]

Here you go - read it and start crying like Sharp.

From the SEC:

Please respond to these comments within ten business days by providing the requested information or advise us as soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our
comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response."

"We note your disclosure with regard to the treatment of shares held by Warwick Calasse as treasury shares. Please provide your analysis as to why these shares should not be treated as issued and outstanding."

Sharp's response:

"We note your disclosure with regard to the treatment of shares held by Warwick Calasse as treasury shares. Please provide your analysis as to why these shares should not be treated as issued and outstanding.

Response: We have revised our disclosure to treat the Series A preferred issued to Warwick Calasse as issued and outstanding and to make clear that Mr. Sharp has retained control of Goff Corp. through the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of Series A preferred and 1,000,000 shares of common stock.

Sharp failed in his attempt to steal the Calasse stock.

If the SEC thought that Calasse obtained the stock fraudulently they wouldn't have made Sharp return the stock to Calasse.

So much for your hundreds of posts about Calasse - why do you continue to ignore the facts and keep pumping.

I posted an example about the CYNK CEO and they knew he was duped by the insiders just like Calasse was duped.

IG