The only argument the antagonists have is always centered around the fact that none of the developments I fully expect to see realized have, as yet, come to pass. Instead, there is, "Not a peep from management."
I haven't seen anything disproven that was in the Top Line Data of the LIVE-AIR trial. Not only were those trial results verified by the Lancet peer-review, they were bolstered by the Thorax peer-review, based upon patient stratification by CRP levels.
I would link, for the 100th time, Humanigen's home page, with access to the Lancet and Thorax peer reviews, but I am now getting an error message trying to do so.
"Looks like this domain isn't connected to a website yet"
Most vaccine manufacturers don't use mRNA technology, they use traditional methodology, and incorporate an inactive form of the virus, for example. That's what Novavax does, and they are the only non-mRNA vaccine manufacturer authorized in the US.
The majority of the overseas vaccine manufacturers should be candidates to use lenz as an enhancement to their vaccines. We patented the process for this application, as I've shown before.
"METHODS FOR TREATING CORONAVIRUS INFECTION AND RESULTING INFLAMMATION-INDUCED LUNG INJURY Publication number: 20230109208 Abstract: The present invention provides methods for treating a subject infected with 2019 coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) comprising administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of a GM-CSF antagonist or a therapeutically effective amount of a GM-CSF antagonist and a second drug, including an anti-viral agent, an anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and serum containing human polyclonal antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Type: Application Filed: March 8, 2021 Publication date: April 6, 2023 Applicant: HUMANIGEN, INC. Inventors: Cameron DURRANT, Dale CHAPPELL"
It is not accurate to consider the subject of vaccine enhancement as "off topic." Quite the contrary, vaccine enhancement is THE MAIN OPPORTUNITY I am hoping to see Humanigen capture.