Replies to post #74148 on Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[hedge_fun]

The way a message board works is you……

explain how it’s not correct, just as I did the other day when you posted this.

GMan remember the SeaSearcher tech was not fully complete at Melbourne as it is now.

Instead of doing a drive by post saying that wasn’t correct, I simply shared something from SFRX that they filed a few days ago.

Up to the date of this filing, all tests of new and unproven technology and methods have failed with the exception of the Company’s proprietary SeaSearcher device which is still in development.

See page 4: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1106213/000119983524000134/sfrx-10k.htm

Feel free to explain how my statement isn’t correct.

TIA

[trueblue]

It’s amazing how the price moving higher lights a bigger fire under the naysayers asks? It’s definitely going to leave a very ugly mark in their memory!! Glad I own my shares and never was persuaded by negative nellys!! Jmo