InvestorsHub Logo

fuagf

03/25/24 9:18 PM

#468074 RE: B402 #468052

B402, WHA?? The fact they lowered it so Trump could pay it did not mean they
disagreed with it being set in the first place. Your "disagreed with" is baseless .

'I posted that fact check earlier.....Seems the panel of 5 judges disagree with Engoron.....They had the same numbers to work with.......
You are speaking of multinationals and bigger corps
You missed this part of the fact check,, As I noted in my post, its a good read on the subject
Larger companies have paid for appeals bonds of $1 billion or more, or twice the value of the one former President Donald Trump faces.
An appeals bond that is the value of the one Trump faces is more common for larger companies than for a closely held, privately owned company such as the Trump Organization, experts said.
And
This judgment’s size is not unprecedented, according to examples provided by James’ office and an expert we contacted. A judgment that big is more common in cases involving large or multinational corporations than with a privately owned, closely held company such as the Trump Organization.
"

There is nothing at all in that fact check which justifies you saying they disagreed with Engoron. They simply lowered it so Trump could pay it.

And your posting it earlier has nothing to do with what you replied to. And nothing i said or didn't say even suggested i missed any of the fact check.

I didn't miss any of it. Your even thinking i missed any of it again is evidence that you can't resist having a go at us.

Testing your control over your own basic impulse will be hilarious as hell - for a day or so.